Monday, August 6, 2012

Just call me two-faced.

Goodreads is awesome. It's my new Internet procrastination tool obsession. I get excited updating my book status. It's like checking something off on my to-do list. I also like looking back on my year and seeing what I've read and when. Yes, I'm a nerd.

And then there's the whole rating of books thing. Some writers don't want to rate books, others have no issues writing lengthy reviews. I'm kind of in the middle. I will rate them, but I'm not writing reviews anymore since they feel like mini book reports, which feels too much like school. While I liked school, a book report is just me spewing made-up crap at other people. I'd much rather have a conversation about a book. Way more interesting.

I wish I could assign two ratings to a book. One for the reader in me, and one for the writer. I guess I'm a little two-faced.

A while back I finished reading a highly regarded book I didn't enjoy. I thought it was well done, which is why I finished it. The book gave me the heebie jeebies. I was really disturbed and slightly revolted by the content, but I was still rooting for the characters. When it was time to rate the book, I couldn't do it.

As a writer, I appreciate the originality, voice and writing chops it took to write it. I admire the author's willingness to push through some tough content and "go there." But my reader side wants to tell everyone she knows NOT to read this book. She wants to un-read the book and pretend it never happened. I object to almost everything about it.

Maybe my strong reaction to the book is reason enough for me to give it a high star rating on Goodreads. After all, a strong reaction means the writing was good right? It's not like I didn't care about the protagonists. Maybe that's the reason it's highly rated by others.

I look at my ratings like an endorsement of the book, and I feel awkward rating a book highly when I would never in a million years tell anyone to read it - even if I appreciated the way the author did it from a more analytical point of view.

Do you rate books on Goodreads? Do your reader and writer selves butt heads over what a book should be rated? Should I stop thinking so much? (It wouldn't be the first time I've heard that).

22 comments:

  1. Ha! I've been thinking about writing a post about Goodreads. I'm still conflicted about what sort of reviews I should write as both a writer and a reader...

    ReplyDelete
  2. It's funny that the last question of this post is answered by the quote at the top of your blog. :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. LOL Suze. You are totally right. I did answer my own question there.

      Delete
  3. I rate and review every book I read on Goodreads. Except for the ones that are so awful I can't finish and I'd hurt the author (usually a blogging friend) if I reviewed it so I don't. But otherwise, I enjoy writing reviews and also reading them. I feel like Goodreads is one of the few places we can be honest in our reviews. Not meant, not hurtful but honest. Like the one you're talking about-- you had positive things to say about the author's talent and skills but the story just wasn't for you. Why not say that in your review? It's intelligent and honest and could help others decide whether or not to read the book. I happen to like really intense, dark, well-written novels so it would probably make me WANT to read the book!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm with you in that I always review & rate books I've read, but not ones I am not going to finish or didn't finish. ;) Then again I usually finish everything I start reading, no matter how much I hate reading it - 'cause I'm weird like that.

      Delete
    2. Trisha - I do the same thing! I finish books I hate reading 99% of the time (although sometimes i have to take a break). I have to really dislike it to never go back to it ever again. I can count the number of times that's happened on one hand.

      Delete
  4. I like to use Goodreads to keep track of the books I've read, but I don't review or even rate them online. But I love to talk about books for hours!

    ReplyDelete
  5. I rate most of the books I read but don't always write reviews. Books, like art, are so subjective. If it's a book by a long dead author I don't have any qualms about telling why I liked or didn't like it, but current authors? Much harder.

    ReplyDelete
  6. i used to rate books, but I don't anymore. Too much pressure in that for me, I think. I don't mind writing reviews, mostly because I treat them as a conversation. Lol.

    I'm curious about this book you had such a strong reaction to. I would have a hard time knowing how to rate that too. There are books that I've not been able to stop thinking about which I sort of hated. But the fact that it affected me so deeply makes me wonder if it wasn't in fact a worthy book. I suppose that's why I prefer to have a review instead of a rating. The review just explains my reaction to the book, letting readers judge for themselves, while the rating seems to outright recommend it or discourage people from reading it. That said, I only post reviews on Goodreads if I've already written one to post on my blog. LOL. Which means I don't review every book I read! Wayyyy too much work.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I always rate books I've read on GoodReads, yeah. I don't get how people can rate books they never even finished, but that's just me. ;) And I really think that everyone who's read a book should rate it and give their honest opinion in a review (even a 2-line review!). But that's just the "info collector" in me I guess.

    I am pretty well addicted to GoodReads, love it :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I wouldn't rate a book I haven't finished. It seems wrong. What if the ending totally changed how you viewed the book?

      Delete
  8. I do rate books, but I only sometimes write a review for them. Review writing is not my forte.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I hear you - it can be a tough call. I rate books only four or five star. If I think they deserve less, I just mark them as 'read' and leave it at that.

    ReplyDelete
  10. omg--Kari! I had this exact reaction to SHIVER by MS. I can't spell her name. I write the review saying all my writer self problems w/the book, and then I took it all back by saying the reader-Leigh would've never thought any of those things--LOL! :D She would've just loved it. Period.

    But I'm in the middle of another book that's all hyped, and it's driving me CRAZY! I keep highlighting passages on my kindle and typing "WHAT???" Certain metaphors make zero sense. Like they're ludicrous! Anyway, so yes. I have this problem. And I only just discovered that you don't *have* to put stars w/your GR rating! Wow. :D <3

    ReplyDelete
  11. I feel the same way. I have loved poorly written books and hated well written ones. I am on the fence myself about reviews. I don't mind rating them, but giving a book a review is too much. I keep those thoughts to myself.
    Unless I love it so much I have to tell everyone and then I blog about it. (Like I did last week.):)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I never know what to say in a review. When I'm done writing them they always feel so stupid. I probably try too hard.

      Delete
  12. I rate books on Shelfari, but it's basically the same thing. I've debated with myself on several occasions whether or not I should give a book a high or low or middling rating . . . and sometimes just forego the whole thing entirely.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I love Goodreads too! And I do rate and review some books. But the rating system seems a little flawed to me. It isn't to do with how well a book is written, it's to do with how you FEEL about a book. Eg. 4 out of 5 stars is "really liked it". So sometimes I read a book and recognise that it is incredibly well written, but I don't enjoy it at all because it just isn't my thing. Then I want to give it 1 or 2 stars because I PERSONALLY didn't enjoy it, but to other readers that might look like I thought the book was terrible, which it isn't! Maybe there should be two ratings: one for how good you think the book was, and one for how you actually personally liked it.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I do rate books, but I never hand out a really low rating. If you write a review you can warn readers what you didn't like in the book.

    ReplyDelete
  15. I do write reviews of books I finished on Goodreads, only because I have a book review blog I'm trying to maintain. When it comes to rating, when my reader self and writer self clash I don't rate the book. I just mark it as read and move on. Same thing goes for books that I flat out didn't enjoy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I didn't know you had a book review blog Akoss! OMG. You'll have to send me a link. I'll have to check out some of your reviews on Goodreads. :) I think I did get my answer in terms of whether or not I should rate the book badly. The answer for most authors seems to be "no" to low ratings. Problem solved for me. :)

      Delete
  16. I have no problems posting a rating, whatever the score, but when it comes to reviews I'll only post favorable ones. As my mother always told us kids, if you don't have anything nice to say, then say nothing at all. :)

    ReplyDelete